I was privileged to watch the Binay Foundation’s Leadership in Crisis conference with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani as guest speaker.
I wasn’t as interested in the introductory speech by Oscar Lopez as much as I was in watching Giuliani speak. A thirty-something Sex and the City fan (I am, after all, a girl in the 21st century), I was ready to listen to his stories about New York and how he overcame the 9/11 situation.
I was quite disappointed to hear what seemed to me like a digested Seven Habits of Highly Effective People.
Guiliani gave six tips:
1. Have a sense of GOAL.
2. Be an OPTIMIST.
3. Have COURAGE.
4. Build a good TEAM.
5. COMMUNICATE.
6. Have a SENSE OF HUMOR.
These are nuggets of wisdom that Stephen Covey has in his books and that La Sallites are indoctrinated in before every schoolyear (if you’re a student leader or officer of an org).
Fortunately, he did share briefly about the 9/11 experience. He says that although he sent his team home the night of the tragedy to get some sleep and be ready for the events the following day, he went to Ground Zero that night and stayed there another two hours til maybe 3 in the morning. He couldn’t sleep. He also shared how he handled the media; that he was just honest with them although he did not announce the number of casualties immediately, telling the public they would not be able to handle it. Fortunately, he didn’t, because the initial number of deaths reported to him was 12,000 when it fact it was much less at around 3,000.
Cheche Lazaro moderated/hosted the show and asked the participants’ questions for us. The questions asked before lunch (I left at noon and didn’t finish the conference) did not discuss Philippine politics at all; I was waiting for Lazaro to read a question on Giuliani’s suggestion to help us solve our current crises: on the economy and even morally. I only read the answer in the papers today: that on Philippine politics, Giuliani suggested that we should choose a leader we can trust.
That’s a very good answer but politics is deeper and trickier than it appears. His answer only scratched the surface of the problem. It’s textbook and does not take into consideration the wiliness of Philippine politicians.
One thing to note here is the class divide. In Philippine politics, the leader that the AB Upper C trust is not the same leader that the lower C DE trust. AB would trust Mar Roxas, Manny Villar. CDE would trust Noli de Castro, Joseph Estrada.
Classic case in point: 1998. AB trusted JDV. But the majority chose to trust Joseph Estrada. Estrada could never be trusted by the upper and middle class. They hated him, reviled him, made fun of him. Meanwhile, the exact opposite can be said of the lower class: they love him and practically worship him.
So Giuliani’s message is incomplete in that along with the trust should come respect. American politics portrays this when a defeated candidate in the presidential nomination respects the decision of the majority. Giuliani himself graciously exited from the presidential race and is now being a sport and showing full support for Mc Cain. Same with Hillary to Obama. That never happens in this country. When de Villa lost to JDV, he started his own party. Same with Lacson.
The reason why trust and respect must come hand in hand is that when the few make their voices louder than the majority, the national direction moves toward the objectives of the few instead of the objectives of the majority. The concerns of the few are prioritized over the concerns of the majority. Then the majority becomes miserable because the few insisted on their way, instead of respecting the decision of the lot.
But that’s Philippine politics for you. It’s my way or the highway. What can we do? We can only pray for a leader who will cut across classes and lead us to our deliverance. That or move abroad. Contradicts Giulani’s second tip but it’s the truth.

Posted by margauxsalcedo
Posted by margauxsalcedo
Posted by margauxsalcedo